Master Interweaving

Business Transformations through a structured integration and alignment of Strategy with Operations.

Anders is a Master Interweaver and Architect with international experiences on all levels, United Nation, EU, global, regional and national (standardisation) organisations, as well as national state agencies. 

FEB
16

Stories of Digital Transformation

#DigitalTransformation journey's are described by a manifold of stories. 

Each story adds a piece but what happens when you put them all together? What story is that?

For some, … 

  • digital enablers such as sensors, mobile devices, and new material is the most important story.
  • the socio-economic evolution in the information age pulls us all into the future.
  • digitisation of existing processes is vital.
  • people's digital talents are at the center.
  • management and entrepreneurial mind-sets  drive the lean and digital organisation.
  • IS/IT is necessary and in focus.
  • new business models, identity and vision direct you to where-to-play.
  • innovation and agility save you from disruption,
  • transformation of the workforce and organisation is the way to the future.
  • partnering and renting your resources paves the way to become an exponential organisation.
  • customer orientation is obvious.
  • knowing what you know and don’t know, lead you to traverse build-measure-learn cycle fast.
  • trend awareness and strategy lead the way.

No single story tells it all.

#Interweaving is interested in how all these stories Interweave.

Continue reading
  1305 Hits
1305 Hits
DEC
22

Neo-Generalists make excellent Interweavers

The book “The NEO-Generalist” is a fascinating read, with a surprising connection to Interweaving. It turns out that neo-generalists would make excellent Interweavers with their mind-sets.

A few example quotes from the book “The NEO-Generalist”, by Kenneth Mikkelsen, Richard Martin, 2016, to illustrates the point.

“A neo-generalist is a serial specialist that traverse the space in-between the polarities.”

Continue reading
  1924 Hits
1924 Hits
DEC
11

The dirty little capability secret: Success Criteria

The series is for you that use capability based methods, and not for method or framework builders.

An important question for any method or artifact is, how do you define success? This is especially important in this case where knowledge about the capability secret is likely to change the perception of what a capability is and what a capability can and should be used for.

Continue reading
  1400 Hits
Tags:
1400 Hits
DEC
10

Have you done the MOCKAFJONG test?

knowledge-blue-340w320h

A Mockafjong is a beautiful thingymajig. It is something wondrous, fascinating and important to talk about.

When you find yourself in discussions where you wonder what you really are talking about. Try to replace the key “word” used to refer to the centre of the discussion with “Mockafjong”. Try replacing “digital transformation” or “capability” with “Mockafjong”. 

Suddenly you all have to be careful about you say. You have to explain better without relying on peoples underlying and often widely different common sense. You become released from your languages biases.

What do you mean by  “Mockafjong”? I, erm, hmm, mean …

  1360 Hits
1360 Hits
DEC
09

The W (with) that J. Zachman missed

It was a fun idea to write this article a couple of years ago. But, then the realities of the thought started to become problematic. After a while the reported EA problems with generating business outcomes became tedious to listen to and trying react to. So I decided to move on, with a new product development and a Pivot, the Interweaving practice. But, here is a short version of the article.

The Zachman Framework (now called Zachman Enterprise Ontology) is part of the enterprise architecture (EA) inheritage. It was invented and now maintained by John Zachman.

Continue reading
  1098 Hits
1098 Hits
DEC
07

Digital Transformation presentation at BrightTALK

Please find my presentation about Digital Transformation and Interweaving, held 5 dec at BrightTALK. The slide deck contains a few slides that were not presented due to time.

At Slideshare

Enjoy!

  1170 Hits
1170 Hits
NOV
25

The dirty little capability secret: A quiz

The dirty little capability secret: A quiz

If you get some time over you should, from time to time, stop and reflect on the material  / artifacts you use in your work. Reflection is especially valuable on material / artifacts that experts, consultants and other service providers provide you with.

Here is a simple quiz to guide your reflection:

Continue reading
  1371 Hits
Tags:
1371 Hits
OCT
27

The dirty little capability secret: The Yes ..., but.. dialog

The dirty little capability secret: The Yes ..., but.. dialog

Something interesting happened when I shared the capability secret with colleagues, professionals, and researchers. A “yes…, but …” dialog appeared. 

This kind of dialog and reactions, can important for you to be aware of when something new and simple is introduced and discussed. Especially if you use ideas and methods provided by others, such as experts and consultants.

The series is for you that use capability models, and not for method or framework builders.

Continue reading
  1123 Hits
Tags:
1123 Hits
OCT
27

The dirty little capability secret …

The dirty little capability secret …

 … is the title of a series of articles that expose a secret behind capability based analysis, capability system thinking and capability management.

The series is for you that use capability models, and not for method or framework builders.

It is a secret that can, and often do, make thinking about capabilities go wrong and frameworks to deliver poor decision making material.

It is a secret that turns attention and efforts away from real business and organisational topics.

The secret is easy to spot and easy to understand. It is an insight based on practical work and research. Although confirmation bias and sunk costs may prevent the insight to take effect.

Continue reading
  1288 Hits
Tags:
1288 Hits
OCT
23

Are Enterprise and Business Architects the new Borgs?

Are Enterprise and Business Architects the new Borgs?

It was a fun idea to write this article a couple of years ago. But, then the realities of the thought started to become problematic. After a while the reported EA problems with generating business outcomes became tedious to listen to and trying react to. So I decided to move on, with a new product development and a Pivot, the Interweaving practice. But, here is a short version of the article.

Why a Borg analogy? Why reflect on ones own profession using fictional, fun and not so serious glasses? Can an analogy give some insights that are valuable to product development? The answer to the last question is Yes.

The Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice(s) has been going through great turmoil the last 10 year or so. EA works well inside IS/IT and engineering but experience significant problems when trying to escape its IS/IT roots and tradition. Initial customer interests are reported to be turned into rejection and then EA efforts are moved back into IS/IT again.

For those of you that haven’t encountered the Borgs, they are a formidable alien race encountered in the Star Trek TV and Movies series a while ago. They come from technological and cybernetic origins and they traverse the universe to assimilate encountered races, their technology and knowledge. A Borg credo is “Resistance is futile” and their ultimate goal is to "achieving perfection”.

When looking at recent trends in EA / BA methods and frameworks one can easily observe the vast number of assimilated knowledge and know-how. Here we find…

Continue reading
  1976 Hits
1976 Hits
JUL
24

Interweaving Enriched Design Journey

Interweaving enrich a Design Journey or Process by adding an Interweaving step to address…

“164 executives at companies with more than $1 billion in revenue, 26%, told us the transition from innovation or R&D group to the business unit “needs serious work” at their company. Another 16% described it as ‘terrible’,” [Harvard Business Review]

“A full 81% of those surveyed say that fewer than 25% of their startup pilots have resulted in commercial deals.” [Fortune]

Continue reading
  1354 Hits
Tags:
1354 Hits
JUN
06

Meaningful ... What do you want? - Business Capabilities

Meaningful ... What do you want? - Business Capabilities

In the previous Meaningful … article about Business Capabilities I covered 2 meaningful topics.

Meaningful ... Business Capabilities

  • You need to know what “Innovation” is before discussing am “Innovation Management Capability”
  • The result part of a capability depends on a number of source factors.

In this article I bring to the surface the question of what kind of capability you really want to include in a capability model or map?

Do yo want to be capable of ..

Continue reading
  1475 Hits
Tags:
1475 Hits
JUN
05

Meaningful ... Business Capabilities

Meaningful ... Business Capabilities

What is more meaningful to you and in work you do, with others across boundaries? A seemingly simple question. A question that deserves some thoughts.

In this short article I focus on the tool of Business Capabilities. A new idea served hot to executives and management by consultants and analysts.

Let us examine two meaningful questions:

Continue reading
  1285 Hits
Tags:
1285 Hits
JUN
01

Improving Capabilities from Open Group (TOGAF Business Capabilities)

It was with great interest that I opened the Open Group’s guide for Business Capabilities. This business architecture addendum is a welcome addition to their (information) technology oriented Enterprise Architecture framework - TOGAF. TOGAF is a well known, respected, and widely used framework with quite many practitioners. 

Half-way through the guide something started to bother me. Something felt very familiar. Then I realised that the guide follows the tradition of framework presentations. A framework is explained first, then the benefits of using the it, are assumed to be obvious and clear.

This article is aimed at people interested in getting some ideas on how to enrich capability based analysis and modelling based on frameworks such as TOGAF.

Continue reading
  1322 Hits
1322 Hits
MAY
03

Tools of the trade: Talking Point Canvas

Tools of the trade: Talking Point Canvas

A Talking Point Canvas is 1-page communication tool that has talking points for communication. The canvas organise talking points in illustrations, diagrams or boxes and they fit on an A5 to A2 paper, Powerpoint page, or a web page.

The purpose is typically to organise and focus communications, discussions and deliberations on a particular topic consisting of several talking points and dimensions.

An example, a SWOT canvas has the result of an assessment with results organised in two dimensions: internal-external, and evaluative better-worse. The 4 talking points are Strength (internal, better), Weakness (internal, worse), Opportunity (external, better), Threat (external, worse).

In many cases a talking point canvas presents a synthesis where assumptions, facts, hypothesis, decisions, vantage points, background analysis, details and dependencies are omitted for clarity and focus.

However, there exist a danger when discussing talking points in separation, without taking into consideration what is behind the surface and how the different talking points relate.

Continue reading
  1287 Hits
1287 Hits
APR
19

Inside-Out, Outside-In, are there more to explore?

The question wether a company is or should be driven by Inside-Out and/or Outside-In thinking is highly relevant to ask. 

A strategic approach based on an Inside-Out vantage point is guided by that the inner strengths and capabilities of the organisation will make the organisation successful. An Outside-In approach is guided by external and environmental forces, and that customer value creation, customer orientation and customer experiences are key to success. In the post “Outside-In: Customer Experience Optimizer?”, Dr. Samir Asaf argues that High Performance Organizations need to think both from an inside-out and outside-in vantage points. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/outside-in-customer-experience-optimizer-dr-samir-asaf-cdir-fiod

However, one can ask if there are more vantage points to explore with respect to a company and its strategy? And how long it takes before you fall off a strategy canvas or strategic thinking model?

The short answers are yes and sometimes quickly.

Continue reading
  1393 Hits
Tags:
1393 Hits
MAR
30

Untangling: Is there more than a Capability to think about?

Untangling: Is there more than a Capability to think about?

Another innocent question with far reaching consequences. 

As I pointed out in the previous article, a capability depends on an underlying concept. Untangling: What comes first, economical concept or capability? But are there more to consider when looking at the world through capability lenses?

Yes, there are plentiful more to be aware of. The capability literature and methods are full of additional aspects. One may wonder if capability has become a wish list for missing strategical and operational talking points? The presence of these embedded aspects may, to a degree, explain why there are many variants of capability based analysis’s and planning methods. Some aspects are explicitly described, but many are tacit or implicit. 

In this article Im taking at look at how capabilities also reflect different Units

Continue reading
  1648 Hits
Tags:
1648 Hits
MAR
24

Untangling: What comes first, economical concept or capability?

Untangling: What comes first, economical concept or capability?

An innocent looking question with far reaching consequences. 

The question comprises two parts. ‘What comes first’ brings up what is most important (salient) to people in work they do with others in an organisation. The second part brings up the relationship and dependency between an economical concept and a capability.

The answer is that economical concepts come first and are primary for people in-front of the model theoretical curtain. Without knowing what Customer Retention is and that it is important, a retain customer capability cannot be described. Keep reading to find out why. 

Continue reading
  1432 Hits
Tags:
1432 Hits
MAR
21

Untangling Capability, Process, and Service (2) - How to?

This is the 2nd article of two and continues with the outline of the most important aspects to keep in mind while reading and untangling.

The 1st part of this article: Untangling Capability, Process, and Service (1)- How to?

Bridging the gap

I am using the technique of stripping to ‘undress’ specific definitions, frameworks, theories, and approaches of their non-essential parts to find the minimal definition. By remembering what have been removed we can later use this knowledge in analysis, comparisons, and (re-)creation of specific theories, approaches, and practices.

The parts that are removed, form an important knowledge base that can be used for intentional design of theories and approaches. Theory builders can use this knowledge base to better understand their own work and maybe unveil their own tacit and implicit assumptions.

Continue reading
  1357 Hits
Tags:
1357 Hits
MAR
21

Untangling Capability, Process, and Service (1) - How to?

An untangling exercise benefits from being well though-out and structured. This article outline the most important aspects to keep in mind while reading.

The starting point for the untangling series: The wonderfully convoluted worlds of Capabilities, Processes and Services

Btw: these articles aimed at experts, working behind the curtain. If you don't mind a mental exercise, then please continue with the article(s).

If you are looking for “simplicity” then I suggest to skip to the end of the series where I present a fusion of the essences of “capability”, “process”, and “service”.

Human centric, work oriented, and instrumental

At the center of untangling three principles are important. The approach I’m take is human centric, work oriented, and instrumental. These principles offer a focus on what is most important (salient). They provide advice on how the evaluate performance (how well). The instrumental and enabling use of capability, process, and service ideas and analysis techniques must be worthwhile to people in work they do with others. The focus is firmly set on generating benefits for people, their work, problems and questions, and not on technical qualities of work products or techniques. Qualities such as workable, beneficial, material, acceptable, and agreeable take precedence over product qualities.

Continue reading
  1332 Hits
Tags:
1332 Hits
Wait a minute, while we are rendering the calendar